A Model for Improving Lecturer Performance Through Tacit Knowledge Sharing at Private Universities in Yogyakarta
Keywords:
Perceived Value, Altruism Behavior , Willingness to Share , Trust, Tacit Knowledge SharingAbstract
Objective research This test will include knowledge, relationships with values, and altruistic conduct. Study This was completed in a private college in Universities in Yogyakarta using a quantitative and qualitative approach. Quantitative approach sample lecturer up to 294 persons. Approach qualitative by using three sources to find person leaders in higher education. According to research findings, conduct altruism is the best predictor of desire. Perceived value support is a crucial component of information sharing between lecturers on both an internal and external level. conclusions from the data This calls for the routine discussion of study programs at the lowest structural level, as well as discussions at the faculty and university levels, as well as discussions with party external Good fellow academics or with non-academicians, before activity. Regulations that guarantee quality as a tool for control must be applied to this. All of these ideas are capable of improving lecturer caliber and bringing about the Tri Dharma of Higher Education.
References
[1] Andrianaivo, M., & Kpodar, K. (2012). Mobile phones, financial inclusion, and growth. IMF Working Paper.
[2] Asbari, M., Santoso, P. B., & Purwanto, A. (2019). Influence of leadership and knowledge sharing on employee performance. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 1(1), 1–10.
[3] Becker, J. M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2015). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394.
[4] Brülhart, M., & Usunier, J. C. (2008). Does the trust game measure trust? Economics Letters, 100(3), 371–374.
[5] Castañeda, D. I. (2015). Knowledge sharing: The role of psychological variables in the transfer of knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1162–1177.
[6] De Vries, R. E., Van den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. A. (2006). Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115–135.
[7] Du, R., Ai, S., & Ren, Y. (2012). Relationship between knowledge sharing and performance: A survey in Chinese enterprises. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8898–8906.
[8] Garcia-Perez, A., Amado-Salvatierra, H. R., & Sanchez-Gordillo, J. (2018). Knowledge management in higher education institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(7), 1607–1629.
[9] Gamble, P. (2020). Knowledge management: A state of the art guide. London: Kogan Page.
[10] Gosain, S., Malhotra, A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2004). Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 7–45.
[11] Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128–140.
[12] Honeycutt, E. D. (2014). Altruism and social exchange theory. Journal of Business Research, 67(4), 455–463.
[13] Khoa, B. T., Hung, B. P., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). The relationship between altruism behavior and employee trust in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(3), 233–245.
[14] Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3–4), 315–332.
[15] Mahmood, A., Qureshi, M. A., & Shahbaz, M. (2020a). Knowledge sharing behavior and organizational performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(4), 430–440.
[16] Mahmood, A., Qureshi, M. A., & Shahbaz, M. (2020b). Perceived value and tacit knowledge sharing behavior in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1883–1903.
[17] Mohajan, H. K. (2019). Knowledge sharing among employees in organizations. Journal of Economic Development, 4(2), 1–15.
[18] Natek, S., & Lesjak, D. (2021). Knowledge management practices in organizations. Management Review, 12(1), 45–58.
[19] Nesic, S., & Lalic, B. (2016). The role of trust in knowledge sharing. Management Journal, 21(2), 67–75.
[20] Ni, J., & Ganesharatnam, S. (2022). Tacit knowledge sharing and teacher innovation capability. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(2), 263–280.
[21] Obrenovic, B., Du, J., & Khudaykulov, A. (2020). The role of altruism in knowledge sharing behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1863–1882.
[22] Ogunmokun, O. A., Eluwole, K. K., & Avci, T. (2020). The role of trust in knowledge sharing behavior. Journal of Business Research, 109, 438–449.
[23] Philipson, S., & Kjellström, S. (2020). Knowledge creation in organizations. Management Decision, 58(7), 1352–1367.
[24] Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[25] Samadi, B., Wei, C., & Yusoff, W. F. W. (2015). The impact of organizational trust on knowledge sharing. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(5), 1–10.
[26] Sentika, R., & Arissaputra, M. I. (2022). Knowledge sharing behavior in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 6(1), 55–67.
[27] Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131.
[28] Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. (2009). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among university students. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 6(1), 121–126.
[29] Zhao, J., Ha, S., & Widdows, R. (2018). Consumer responses to knowledge sharing in organizations. Journal of Business Research, 91, 345–354.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Septika Nugraha, Denis Nugraha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
