Peer Review Process

Peer review is an important process in scientific journal publication that helps ensure that published papers meet high academic standards. Here is the peer review process for Journal of Technopreneurship (JT):

1. Acceptance of papers

Every paper submitted to this journal will be reviewed by the editor-in-chief and the editorial board. Papers will be accepted if they meet the eligibility criteria and are relevant to the journal's focus.

2. Assignment of reviewers

The editor-in-chief will assign two or three reviewers who are experts in fields relevant to the paper's topic. The assignment of reviewers will be done confidentially, and the identity of the reviewers will not be disclosed to the authors or through the double-blind peer review method.

3. Review by reviewers

Reviewers will review the paper and provide recommendations to the editorial board within 2 weeks of receipt of the review assignment. The review includes the appropriateness of the topic, accuracy, adequacy, and clarity of writing.

4. Notification of review results

The editorial board will notify the authors of the review results via email. If the paper is accepted, the editorial board will submit recommendations for improvements or revisions to be made by the author prior to publication. If the paper is rejected, the editor-in-chief will provide clear and detailed reasons for the rejection.

5. Revision by the author

Authors must revise the paper in accordance with the recommendations provided by the editorial board and reviewers within 2 weeks after receipt of the revision recommendations.

6. Review by reviewers

The revised paper will be reviewed by the same reviewers or, if required, new reviewers.

7. Final decision

The editorial board will decide whether the paper is accepted or rejected after considering the results of the review and revisions made by the author.

8. Publication

Accepted papers will be published in an issue that conforms to the publication schedule of Journal of Technopreneurship (JT).