Reviewer Guidelines

Journal Purpose

Journal of Technopreneurship (JT) aims to facilitate the dissemination of current information and knowledge in the field of Technopreneurship and Education. The Journal of Technopreneurship (JT) focuses on fostering innovative research, theories, and practices that advance understanding and promote technopreneurship in educational settings. It covers a wide range of topics, including but not limited to technological innovation, entrepreneurship education, startup ecosystems, curriculum development, and the role of technology in enhancing educational outcomes.

Reviewer Criteria

  1. Have sufficient competence and knowledge in the field of Technopreneurship and Education.
  2. Experienced as a researcher, teacher, or practitioner in the field of Technopreneurship and Education.
  3. Able to conduct reviews objectively and openly without any bias or conflict of interest.

Review Procedure

  1. Each article will be assigned to at least two reviewers based on their field of expertise.
  2. Reviewers will carefully examine the article and provide clear, constructive feedback.
  3. Reviewers will provide recommendations on whether the article is suitable for publication.
  4. Reviewers are expected to provide feedback within 2-4 weeks of receiving the article.

Assessed Aspects

  1. Originality and novelty of the article.
  2. Relevance of the article to the field of Technopreneurship and Education.
  3. The quality of the research methodology used.
  4. Clarity and completeness of data analysis and research results.
  5. Adherence of the article to the writing format and academic rules.

Reviewer Ethics

  1. Maintain the confidentiality of the article assigned for review.
  2. Do not plagiarize or use information obtained from the article being reviewed for personal gain.
  3. Provide honest, open, and objective feedback.
  4. Do not discriminate against authors based on background or institutional origin.

Follow-up

  1. If the article is recommended for publication, the author will be asked to make revisions in accordance with the reviewer's feedback.
  2. If the article is not recommended for publication, the author will be given clear, constructive reasons for future improvement.
  3. If the article is recommended for revision, the author will be asked to make improvements in accordance with the reviewer's feedback and resubmit the revised article for review.
  4. If the article has been revised and stated to meet the criteria for publication, the article will be approved for publication and further processed by the editorial team.

Awards

  1. Reviewers who have reviewed well and consistently will receive an award from the Journal of Technopreneurship (JT).
  2. The award can be in the form of a certificate of appreciation or recognition in journal publications.

Conclusion

The Reviewer Guidelines are expected to assist reviewers in performing their duties properly and consistently. With these guidelines, it is hoped that this journal will maintain high-quality publications relevant to the field of Technopreneurship and Education.